Skip navigation.
Home
The Critic's Resource on AntiEvolution

NCSE Evolution and Climate Education Update for 2013/11/15

(by NCSE Deputy Director Glenn Branch)

Dear friends of NCSE,

The Dallas Observer looks at Texas antievolutionism past and present.
NCSE offers a preview of John Gurche's Shaping Humanity. The executive
director of the National Science Teachers Association offers good
advice to the Texas state board of education. And a new survey
examines public opinion about climate change in Canada.


CREATIONISM'S LAST STAND IN TEXAS?

As the Texas state board of education is preparing for its final
public hearing on science textbook adoption, the Dallas Observer
(November 14, 2013) published a marvelously detailed look at Texas
antievolutionism past and present.

The article begins with Raymond Bohlin, Vice-President of Vision
Outreach for Probe Ministries and a Fellow at the Discovery
Institute's Center for Science and Culture. Although Bohlin earned a
master's degree in population genetics and a doctorate in molecular
and cell biology, he "never accepted the hypothesis central to his
discipline, hardened in the crucible of 150 years of experimentation,
validated by the advent of modern genetics." Bohlin told the Observer
that he undertook his studies in order to be able to debunk evolution:
"If I'm going to be a critic of evolution, I have to make sure I
understand in detail how it's supposed to work."

Bohlin is relevant to the Texas science textbook adoption because, the
Observer explains, "His great investment in a field he entered to
debunk had led him to the Texas State Board of Education, where he was
appointed to be an expert reviewer of high-school biology textbooks.
This, he believes, is where the war against secularism will be won or
lost." As NCSE previously reported, ideologues on the official state
textbook review teams attacked the treatment of evolution and climate
change in science textbooks under consideration in Texas -- and Bohlin
was a primary offender, offering misguided advice about evolution and
climate science alike.

Ron Wetherington, Professor of Anthropology at Southern Methodist
University (and a recipient of NCSE's Friend of Darwin award),
commented, "There are no intelligent people on the side of creationism
who are still urging the teaching of creationism in form or function,"
adding, "It's not worth it for them to do that, so they're putting all
their eggs in the basket of undermining evolution." But the signs are
that the publishers are not willing to capitulate: presumably
paraphrasing, Wetherington described one publisher as responding to a
creationism-inflected critique of its textbook by replying, "Up yours,
we're not going to change anything."

The publishers are emboldened by the fact that the board's decision is
not as important as it was, the Observer suggests, since "school
districts are free to make their own purchasing decisions now ... A
thorough vetting from the state board still represents a Good
Housekeeping Seal of Approval that smaller districts will rely on to
ensure their books meet Texas'[s] curriculum standards. The board's
vote will be influential for years to come, but is no longer the edict
[it] once was." In the future, battles over Texas textbooks may occur
at the level of the individual school district -- of which there are
over one thousand in the state -- rather than at the board.

The textbooks are scheduled to be addressed during a public hearing
before the Texas state board of education, starting at 1:00 p.m. on
November 20, 2013, in Room 1-104 of the William B. Travis Building,
1701 N. Congress Avenue in Austin.

For the Dallas Observer's article, visit:
http://www.dallasobserver.com/2013-11-14/news/creationists-last-stand-at-the-state-board-of-education/full/ 

For information about the board's meeting on November 20, visit:
http://www.tea.state.tx.us/sboe/agenda/ 

And for NCSE's previous coverage of events in Texas, visit:
http://ncse.com/news/texas 

A PREVIEW OF SHAPING HUMANITY

NCSE is pleased to offer a free preview of John Gurche's Shaping
Humanity: How Science, Art, and Imagination Help Us Understand Our
Origins (Yale University Press, 2013). The preview consists of chapter
3, "The Impossible Discovery," in which Gurce relates the history of
Raymond Dart's discovery of the Taung skull, explains the current
state of paleoanthropological thinking about Australopithecus
africanus, and describes his own work reconstructing the head of A.
africanus for the new Hall of Human Origins at the Smithsonian
Institution.

"John Gurche brilliantly brings the long human past alive with his
powerful reconstructions of our extinct precursors, and skillfully
explains just where the boundaries lie between art and science in his
demanding profession," writes Ian Tattersall. Gurche is
artist-in-residence at the Paleontological Research Institute's Museum
of the Earth in Ithaca, New York; his paleoanthropological sculptures
appear in major natural history museums, including the Smithsonian
Institution, the American Museum of Natural History, and the Field
Museum.

For the preview of Shaping Humanity (PDF), visit:
http://ncse.com/book-excerpt 

For information about the book from its publisher, visit:
http://www.yalebooks.com/yupbooks/book.asp?isbn=9780300182026 

NSTA'S ADVICE TO TEXAS

The executive director of the National Science Teachers Association
called on the Texas state board of education to "reject any pressure
to promote any nonscientific views in its textbooks or classrooms."
Writing on Live Science (November 8, 2013), David Evans insisted,
"presenting non-scientific or religious ideas in science class or in
science textbooks is simply wrong and blurs the line about what is and
what is not science. This will only confuse and mislead students and
does nothing to improve the quality of science education and
everything to weaken it."

As NCSE previously reported, publishers submitted their proposed
science textbooks for adoption in Texas in April 2013, and review
panels, composed of Texans chosen by the state board of education,
were responsible for evaluating them. Although ideologues on the
panels attacked the treatment of evolution and climate change in the
textbooks, the publishers stood firm, making no changes that
compromised the scientific integrity of their materials. In his
column, Evans congratulated the publishers "for standing up for
science and rejecting non-science views" on behalf of the NSTA.

NCSE's Joshua Rosenau, who traveled to Austin in September 2013 to
testify before the board in defense of the textbooks, will return
there to monitor the board's deliberations. "The decisions that the
board makes next week will affect science education in Texas, and
nationally, for years to come," Rosenau explained. "It's vital that
NCSE be present -- and that our members show up, too." The textbooks
are scheduled to be addressed during a public hearing starting at 1:00
p.m. on November 20, 2013, in Room 1-104 of the William B. Travis
Building, 1701 N. Congress Avenue in Austin.

For Evans's column at Live Science, visit:
http://www.livescience.com/41080-standing-up-for-science-in-texas.html 

For information about the board's meeting on November 20, visit:
http://www.tea.state.tx.us/sboe/agenda/ 

And for NCSE's previous coverage of events in Texas, visit:
http://ncse.com/news/texas 

POLLING CLIMATE IN CANADA

What do Canadians think about climate change?" Relative to respondents
in the U.S., Canadians are more convinced that climate change is
occurring, more concerned about it, and more willing to pay to address
the issue," according to a researcher quoted in a November 6, 2013,
press release from Canada 2020 -- a thinktank offering progressive
policy for a modern Canada" -- describing the results of the Canada
2020/Université de Montréal National Survey of Canadian Opinions on
Climate Change.

Asked, "From what you've read and heard, is there solid evidence that
the average temperature of earth has been getting warmer over the past
four decades," 81% of Canadian respondents said yes, 12% said no, and
8% said that they were not sure. Acceptance of global warming was
highest in Quebec and the Maritimes (85%) and Ontario (82%), lowest in
Manitoba and Saskatchewan (65%) and Alberta (71%). In the United
States, 61% of respondents said yes, 25% said no, and 14% said that
they were not sure.

Those who said that there was solid evidence of global warming were
then asked, "Is the earth getting warmer because of human activity
such as burning fossil fuels, or mostly because of natural patterns in
the earth's environment?" In Canada, 58% of respondents attributed it
to human activity, 15% to natural patterns, and 23% to a combination;
4% said that they were not sure. In the United States, 40% of
respondents attributed it to human activity, 21% to natural patterns,
and 36% to a combination; 3% said that they were not sure.

The Canadian portion of the survey was administered by Léger to a
nationally representative sample of 1,502 adult Canadians (aged 18 and
over). All surveys were conducted via telephone in English and French
from October 10 to October 20, 2013. Calls were made using both
landline and mobile phone listings. The margin of sampling error for
the full sample is +/- 2.5% in 19 out of 20 samples. Results were
weighted according to gender, age, language and region to reflect the
latest population estimates from Statistics Canada (Census 2011).

The American portion of the survey was administered by the Muhlenberg
College Institute of Public Opinion to a nationally representative
sample of 984 adult Americans (aged 18 and over). All surveys were
conducted from October 3 to October 14, 2013. Calls were made using
both landline and mobile phone listings. The margin of sampling error
for the US sample is +/- 3.5 per cent, 19 times out of 20. Results
were weighted to gender, race income, educational attainment and age
to reflect the most recent population estimates from the 2010 US
census.

For the Canada 2020 press release, visit:
http://canada2020.ca/latestnews/new-poll-canadians-want-federal-leadership-on-climate-change/ 

For the report of the survey (PDF), visit:
http://www.canada2020.ca/climatepoll/docs/Cross_Tabs-Canada_2020_U_of_M_Climate_Poll.pdf 

And for NCSE's collection of polls and surveys on climate change, visit:
http://ncse.com/polls/polls-climate-change 

WHAT'S NEW FROM THE SCIENCE LEAGUE OF AMERICA

Have you been visiting NCSE's blog, The Science League of America,
recently? If not, then you've missed:

* Minda Berbeco debunking a creationist misrepresentation of evolution
and climate science:
http://ncse.com/blog/2013/11/failing-acid-test-0015163 

* Glenn Branch discussing creationism in Europe with Stefaan Blancke:
http://ncse.com/blog/2013/11/creationism-europe-part-1-0015145 
http://ncse.com/blog/2013/11/creationism-europe-part-2-0015146 

* Mark McCaffrey reporting on the preliminary results of a survey of
climate educators:
http://ncse.com/blog/2013/10/very-important-priority-0015150 

* Josh Rosenau estimating how many young-earth creationists there are
in the United States:
http://ncse.com/blog/2013/11/just-how-many-young-earth-creationists-are-there-us-0015164 

And much more besides!

For The Science League of America, visit:
http://ncse.com/blog 

Thanks for reading. And don't forget to visit NCSE's website --
http://ncse.com -- where you can always find the latest news on 
evolution and climate education and threats to them.

--
Sincerely,

Glenn Branch
Deputy Director
National Center for Science Education, Inc.
420 40th Street, Suite 2
Oakland, CA 94609-2509
510-601-7203 x305
fax: 510-601-7204
800-290-6006
branch@ncse.com 
http://ncse.com 

Check out NCSE's new blog, Science League of America:
http://ncse.com/blog 

Read Reports of the NCSE on-line:
http://reports.ncse.com 

Subscribe to NCSE's free weekly e-newsletter:
http://groups.google.com/group/ncse-news 

NCSE is on Facebook, YouTube, and Twitter:
http://www.facebook.com/evolution.ncse 
http://www.youtube.com/NatCen4ScienceEd 
http://twitter.com/ncse 

NCSE's work is supported by its members. Join today!
http://ncse.com/join