NCSE Evolution and Climate Education Update for 2014/02/07

(by NCSE Deputy Director Glenn Branch)

Dear friends of NCSE,

News about antiscience legislation in South Dakota, South Dakota,
Virginia, and South Dakota again. Plus a reminder about Darwin Day.

SOUTH DAKOTA "INTELLIGENT DESIGN" BILL KILLED

South Dakota's Senate Bill 112, which would, if enacted, provide that
"[n]o school board or school administrator may prohibit a teacher in
public or nonpublic school from providing instruction on intelligent
design or other related topics," was killed in the Senate Education
Committee on February 6, 2014, according to the Rapid City Journal
(February 6, 2014).

The bill was killed at the request of its primary sponsor, Jeff Monroe
(R-District 24), who told the Associated Press (February 6, 2014) that
he decided that it was poorly written: "Some [members of the Senate
Education Committee] agreed with the bill, but they would have had to
vote against it, based on the fact that it was written poorly."

Monroe told the Sioux Falls Argus Leader (February 6) that the bill
"was getting too big for the amount of benefit that would come of it.
... I think there are better ways to do this that don't scare the
daylights out of school boards and get everybody riled up." He also
told the newspaper that he thought that students should be allowed to
"see both sides."

"I'm not sorry to bid farewell to Senate Bill 112, which was flawed in
ways that go far beyond its faulty drafting," NCSE's executive
director Ann Reid commented. "But anyone concerned about the quality
of science education in South Dakota should stay alert, in case a
similar bill comes down the pike in a future legislative session."

For the story in the Rapid City Journal, visit:
http://rapidcityjournal.com/news/local/south-dakota-panel-kills-bill-on-teaching-intelligent-design/article_93e7560f-8f6d-58eb-908a-bd42b9938f99.html 

For the Associated Press story (via the San Francisco Chronicle), visit:
http://www.sfgate.com/news/article/SD-panel-kills-bill-on-teaching-intelligent-design-5210001.php 

For the story in the Argus Leader, visit:
http://www.argusleader.com/article/20140206/UPDATES/302060055/South-Dakota-lawmakers-kill-intelligent-design-personhood-before-birth-bills 

For South Dakota's Senate Bill 112 as introduced, visit:
http://legis.sd.gov/Legislative_Session/Bills/Bill.aspx?File=SB112P.htm&Session=2014 

And for NCSE's previous coverage of events in South Dakota, visit:
http://ncse.com/news/south-dakota 

CONTINUING CONCERN IN SOUTH DAKOTA

"A South Dakota lawmaker wants public school teachers to be free to
teach intelligent design in their classrooms even though courts have
ruled intelligent design is inherently religious -- and therefore
unconstitutional in school," according to a report from KMEG 14,
headquartered in Sioux City, Iowa, just across the Missouri river from
South Dakota. The report was discussing South Dakota's Senate Bill
112, which would, if enacted, require that "[n]o school board or
school administrator may prohibit a teacher in public or nonpublic
school from providing instruction on intelligent design or other
related topics."

NCSE's deputy director Glenn Branch told the station, "A federal court
has already established in 2005 that teaching intelligent design
creationism in the public schools is unconstitutional. [SB 112 is] in
effect encouraging teachers to teach intelligent design creationism
confident [in] the knowledge that there's a law telling their
superiors that they can't interfere with that." Warning of the
potential for litigation as the result of enacting the bill, he
commented, "In the case [Kitzmiller v. Dover] that provoked the
decision in 2005, a local school district was left paying a million
dollars and it could have been more."

A sponsor of the bill, Jeff Monroe (R-District 24), argued that the
Kitzmiller case is irrelevant: "That case was based on the fact that
it forced the teachers to introduce it. That's different from this."
But KMEG's report quoted a key passage from the Kitzmiller decision:
"intelligent design cannot uncouple itself from its creationist, and
thus religious, antecedents." KMEG also quoted the superintendent of a
local school district as reporting that no elected officials have
sought his advice on the bill and as saying, "We don't plan on
changing the way we teach right now and will be following the law of
the land."

For the story from KMEG 14, visit:
http://www.siouxlandnews.com/story/24623693/sd-bill-would-give-teachers-free 

For South Dakota's Senate Bill 112 as introduced, visit:
http://legis.sd.gov/Legislative_Session/Bills/Bill.aspx?File=SB112P.htm&Session=2014 

And for NCSE's previous coverage of events in South Dakota, visit:
http://ncse.com/news/south-dakota 

MIXED NEWS FROM VIRGINIA

Virginia's House Bill 207, which would deprive administrators of the
ability to prevent teachers from miseducating students about
"scientific controversies," is in search of a home. On February 3,
2014, the House Committee on Education referred the bill to the House
Committee on Courts of Justice on a 14-8 vote. But, unusually, the
latter committee refused to accept the bill, so it returns to the
former committee, which is expected to consider it again at its
February 5, 2014, meeting.

The referral was recommended by the House Subcommittee for Elementary
and Secondary Education, which voted 4-3 for it at its January 30,
2014, meeting,according to the Washington Post (January 31, 2014). The
bill's sponsor Richard P. "Dickie" Bell (R-District 20), who chairs
the subcommittee, was one of the three voting against the referral, so
the vote is regarded as a setback for the bill.

The day before the subcommittee hearing, the Post (January 29, 2014)
reported on HB 207, quoting Bell as acknowledging that evolution and
climate change "might fall into [the] category" of scientific
controversies mentioned by the bill. Those topics were cited in
similar bills enacted in Tennessee and Louisiana. Bell earlier told
The Recorder (January 23, 2014) that he was himself a creationist and
regarded global warming as "all theory at this point."

Discounting HB 207's appeal to "lofty secular ideals of openness and
inquiry," NCSE's deputy director Glenn Branch told the Post that
"giving teachers this license will encourage them to use it, and no
one will know what is going on." Branch earlier explained to The
Recorder, "After all, they could claim that in doing so, they're
simply helping their students to understand the scientific strengths
and scientific weaknesses of evolution, climate science,
heliocentrism, etc."

Juanita Jo Matkins, a past president of the Virginia Association of
Science Teachers -- representing the supposed beneficiaries of the
bill -- told the Post that the bill was unnecessary, citing the
emphasis on critical thinking and scientific exploration throughout
the Virginia state science standards. "That is part and parcel of
every standard," she said. Matkins also took exception to the bill's
emphasis on "opinion" and "belief."

Walter Witschey, a professor of science education and anthropology at
Longwood University as well as a past president of the Virginia
Academy of Science and a former director of the Science Museum of
Virginia, attended the subcommittee hearing, and told NCSE that about
ten people spoke in opposition to HB 207, including a variety of
science teachers, representatives of science teaching organizations,
and representatives of religious organizations.

According to Witschey, Bell said that the bill was brought to him by
the Virginia Christian Alliance. The organization explicitly promotes
young-earth creationism, and its vice president of public policy Rita
Dunaway, who also works for the Rutherford Institute, represented Ohio
middle school teacher John Freshwater in hisfailed appeal of his
dismissal for insubordination, which included his use of antievolution
methods and materials in the classroom.

WRIC (January 31, 2014) later reported that Bell acknowledged that he
was approached by the Virginia Christian Alliance and that he claimed
that the bill would allow students to challenge topics like evolution
and global warming -- although only teachers, not students, are
mentioned in the text of the bill. Autumn Reinhardt-Simpson of the
Secular Coalition of Virginia described the bill as "code for
creationism" and as "completely unnecessary."

For Virginia's House Bill 207 as introduced, visit:
http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?141+ful+HB207 

For the January 31, 2014, story in the Washington Post, visit:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/education/virginia-science-bill-sent-to-courts-subcommittee/2014/01/31/918f1e26-8a80-11e3-833c-33098f9e5267_story.html 

For the January 29, 2014, story in the Washington Post, visit:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/education/teachers-oppose-va-bill-challenging-mainstream-science/2014/01/29/faa7924c-885c-11e3-833c-33098f9e5267_story.html 

For the story in The Recorder, visit:
https://recorder.our-hometown.com/news/2014-01-23/Top_News/Maple_fest_proposed_for_state_title.html

For the story at WRIC, visit:
http://www.wric.com/story/24604300/opponents-say-education-bill-promotes-creationism-in-schools 

And for NCSE's previous coverage of events in Virginia, visit:
http://ncse.com/news/virginia 

"INTELLIGENT DESIGN" BILL DEEMED "ODD"

South Dakota's Senate Bill 112 was deemed the "odd bill of the week"
by the Rapid City Journal (February 2, 2014). As NCSE previously
reported, the bill would, if enacted, require that "[n]o school board
or school administrator may prohibit a teacher in public or nonpublic
school from providing instruction on intelligent design or other
related topics." The newspaper commented, "If South Dakota lawmakers
can't tell schools what to teach, some apparently are willing to try
the old double-negative end run, and instead prohibit schools from
prohibiting what can be taught."

Nothing that the bill "could lead to legal challenge in any public
schools that might make ["intelligent design"] part of a curriculum
and that teaching "intelligent design" in the public schools was ruled
to be unconstitutional by a federal court in the 2005 case Kitzmiller
v. Dover, the Journal speculated, "This measure may fall into the
category of bills that South Dakota lawmakers file each year just to
make a personal political statement." SB 112 is not yet on the
calendar of the Senate Education Committee, to which it was referred
after its introduction on January 29, 2014.

For the Rapid City Journal's article, visit:
http://rapidcityjournal.com/news/legislature/odd-bill-of-the-week-feb/article_57c5c84f-47af-5a9a-8780-26f7f0c0bc6c.html 

For South Dakota's Senate Bill 112 as introduced, visit:
http://legis.sd.gov/Legislative_Session/Bills/Bill.aspx?File=SB112P.htm&Session=2014 

And for NCSE's previous coverage of events in South Dakota, visit:
http://ncse.com/news/south-dakota 

DARWIN DAY APPROACHES

It's time to dust off your Darwin costume again: less than a week
remains before Darwin Day 2014! Colleges and universities, schools,
libraries, museums, churches, civic groups, and just plain folks
across the country -- and the world -- are preparing to celebrate
Darwin Day, on or around February 12, in honor of the life and work of
Charles Darwin. These events provide a marvelous opportunity not only
to celebrate Darwin's birthday but also to engage in public outreach
about science, evolution, and the importance of evolution education --
which is especially needed with assaults on evolution education
already under way in state legislatures. NCSE encourages its members
and friends to attend, participate in, and even organize Darwin Day
events in their own communities. To find a local event, check the
websites of local universities and museums and the registry of Darwin
Day events maintained by the Darwin Day Celebration website. (And
don't forget to register your own event with the Darwin Day
Celebration website!)

And with Darwin Day comes the return of Evolution Weekend! Hundreds of
congregations all over the country and around the world are taking
part in Evolution Weekend, February 7-9, 2014, by presenting sermons
and discussion groups on the compatibility of faith and science.
Michael Zimmerman, the initiator of the project, writes, "Evolution
Weekend is an opportunity for serious discussion and reflection on the
relationship between religion and science. One important goal is to
elevate the quality of the discussion on this critical topic -- to
move beyond sound bites. A second critical goal is to demonstrate that
religious people from many faiths and locations understand that
evolution is sound science and poses no problems for their faith.
Finally, as with The Clergy Letter itself, Evolution Weekend makes it
clear that those claiming that people must choose between religion and
science are creating a false dichotomy." At last count, 574
congregations in forty-five states (and thirteen foreign countries)
were scheduled to hold Evolution Weekend events.

For the Darwin Day registry, visit:
http://darwinday.org/events/ 
http://darwinday.org/wp-login.php?action=register 

For information about Evolution Weekend, visit:
http://www.evolutionweekend.org/ 

WHAT'S NEW FROM THE SCIENCE LEAGUE OF AMERICA

Have you been visiting NCSE's blog, The Science League of America,
recently? If not, then you've missed:

* Josh Rosenau covering the Bill Nye/Ken Ham debate before and after:
http://ncse.com/blog/2014/02/getting-ready-nye-ham-debate-0015367 
http://ncse.com/blog/2014/02/how-bill-nye-won-debate-0015369 

* Glenn Branch reviewing the history of creationist efforts in Virginia:
http://ncse.com/blog/2014/01/no-dominion-creationism-part-1-0015342 
http://ncse.com/blog/2014/02/no-dominion-creationism-part-2-0015343 

* Mark McCaffrey describing "the other" NCSE:
http://ncse.com/blog/2014/01/other-ncse-0015356 

And much more besides!

For The Science League of America, visit:
http://ncse.com/blog 

Thanks for reading. And don't forget to visit NCSE's website --
http://ncse.com -- where you can always find the latest news on 
evolution and climate education and threats to them.

--
Sincerely,

Glenn Branch
Deputy Director
National Center for Science Education, Inc.
420 40th Street, Suite 2
Oakland, CA 94609-2509
510-601-7203 x305
fax: 510-601-7204
800-290-6006
branch@ncse.com 
http://ncse.com 

Check out NCSE's new blog, Science League of America:
http://ncse.com/blog 

Read Reports of the NCSE on-line:
http://reports.ncse.com 

Subscribe to NCSE's free weekly e-newsletter:
http://groups.google.com/group/ncse-news 

NCSE is on Facebook, YouTube, and Twitter:
http://www.facebook.com/evolution.ncse 
http://www.youtube.com/NatCen4ScienceEd 
http://twitter.com/ncse 

NCSE's work is supported by its members. Join today!
http://ncse.com/join