Skip navigation.
Home
The Critic's Resource on AntiEvolution

NCSE Evolution and Climate Education Update for 2015/10/02

  • : Function split() is deprecated in /var/www/vhosts/antievolution/public_html/drupal-4.7.3/modules/filter.module on line 1067.
  • : Function split() is deprecated in /var/www/vhosts/antievolution/public_html/drupal-4.7.3/modules/filter.module on line 1067.
  • : Function split() is deprecated in /var/www/vhosts/antievolution/public_html/drupal-4.7.3/modules/filter.module on line 1067.
  • : Function split() is deprecated in /var/www/vhosts/antievolution/public_html/drupal-4.7.3/modules/filter.module on line 1067.

(by NCSE Deputy Director Glenn Branch)

Dear friends of NCSE,

New survey data on the scientific consensus on human-caused climate change.

POLLING SCIENTISTS ON CLIMATE SCIENCE

"Using responses from nearly 700 biophysical scientists," a new survey
"finds that approximately 92 percent of them believe that human-caused
climate change is really happening," according to the Washington Post
(September 25, 2015), reporting on J. S. Carlton, Rebecca Perry-Hill,
Matthew Huber, and Linda S. Prokopy's "The climate change consensus
extends beyond climate scientists," published in Environmental
Research Letters.

Asked "When compared with pre-1800's levels, do you think that mean
global temperatures have generally risen, fallen, or remained
relatively constant?" 93.6% of respondents indicated that they thought
temperatures have risen, 2.1% indicated that they thought temperatures
had remained relatively constant, 0.6% indicated that they thought
temperatures had fallen, and 3.7% indicated they had no opinion or did
not know.

When respondents who indicated that they thought that average global
temperatures have risen when compared to pre-1800s levels were asked,
"Do you think human activity is a significant contributing factor in
changing mean global temperatures?" 98.2% agreed. Multiplying 98.2%
and 93.6%, Carlton and his colleagues concluded, "91.9% of scientists
surveyed believed in anthropogenic climate change."

Presented with the proposition that climate science is a credible
science, 78.79% of respondents strongly agreed, 15.30% moderately
agreed, 3.03% slightly agreed, 1.06% were undecided, 0.61% slightly
disagreed, 0.91% moderately disagreed, and 0.30% strongly disagreed.
Carlton and his colleagues observed, "The average response to 'Climate
science is a credible science' was 6.67 out of 7, indicating strong
agreement."

The researchers concluded, "there is a general consensus among
biophysical scientists across the United States that (1) climate
change is occurring, (2) humans are contributing to it, and (3)
climate science is a trustworthy, mature, and credible discipline.
Scientists who continue to claim otherwise are operating outside of
the consensus, not just of climate scientists, but also of scientists
as a whole."

The survey was conducted among scientists at the twelve universities
in the Big 10 conference. Two thousand scientists were randomly
selected; 1868 were successfully contacted by e-mail and asked to take
the survey; 698 responses were received (for a 37.4% response rate).
Two versions of the survey, including or excluding "cultural values"
questions, were used; there was no significant differences in response
rate between the two versions.

For the story in the Washington Post, visit:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/energy-environment/wp/2015/09/25/yet-another-survey-shows-the-climate-change-debate-is-settled-among-scientists/ 

For "The climate change consensus extends beyond climate scientists," visit:
http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/10/9/094025/meta 

And for NCSE's collection of polls and surveys on climate, visit:
http://ncse.com/polls/polls-climate-change 

WHAT'S NEW FROM THE SCIENCE LEAGUE OF AMERICA

Have you been visiting NCSE's blog, The Science League of America,
recently? If not, then you've missed:

* Minda Berbeco relating the story behind the California Science
Teachers Association's statement on climate change education:
http://ncse.com/blog/2015/09/power-teachers-0016659 

* Stephanie Keep talking to a Dallas teacher with the inside scoop on
Homo naledi:
http://ncse.com/blog/2015/09/discovery-homo-naledi-qa-with-teacher-who-had-inside-scoop-0016661 
http://ncse.com/blog/2015/09/discovery-homo-naledi-qa-with-teacher-who-had-inside-scoop-0016662 

* Emily Schoerning lamenting a well-intentioned campaign to "girlify"
STEM education:
http://ncse.com/blog/2015/09/girls-0016667 

And much more besides!

For The Science League of America, visit:
http://ncse.com/blog 

Thanks for reading. And don't forget to visit NCSE's website --
http://ncse.com -- where you can always find the latest news on 
evolution and climate education and threats to them.

--
Sincerely,

Glenn Branch
Deputy Director
National Center for Science Education, Inc.
420 40th Street, Suite 2
Oakland, CA 94609-2509
510-601-7203 x303
fax: 510-601-7204
800-290-6006
branch@ncse.com 
http://ncse.com 

Check out NCSE's new blog, Science League of America:
http://ncse.com/blog 

Read Reports of the NCSE on-line:
http://reports.ncse.com 

Subscribe to NCSE's free weekly e-newsletter:
http://groups.google.com/group/ncse-news 

NCSE is on Facebook, YouTube, and Twitter:
http://www.facebook.com/evolution.ncse 
http://www.youtube.com/NatCen4ScienceEd 
http://twitter.com/ncse 

NCSE's work is supported by its members. Join today!
http://ncse.com/join