NCSE Evolution and Climate Education Update for 2017/10/06
(by NCSE Deputy Director Glenn Branch)
Dear friends of NCSE, Lots of news from New Mexico. A new survey on climate change. And the return of the Darwin Day Roadshow.
OPPOSITION TO PROPOSED STANDARDS SOLIDIFIES IN NEW MEXICO Opposition to the new state science standards proposed in New Mexico -- which omit references to evolution, human responsibility for climate change, and the age of the earth -- is coming fast and furious. As NCSE previously reported, the proposed standards are modeled on the performance expectations of the Next Generation Science Standards, which have been adopted by eighteen states and the District of Columbia so far. But, as Mother Jones (September 15, 2017) observed, "the draft released by New Mexico's education officials changes the language of a number of NGSS guidelines, downplaying the rise in global temperatures, striking references to human activity as the primary cause of climate change, and cutting one mention of evolution while weakening others." Observing that "it is essential in a modern science curriculum for students to explore science concepts in an open manner, including human impact on climate change, age of the earth, and evolution," the Los Alamos School Board recommended adoption of the NGSS with the addition of certain New-Mexico-specific standards rather than the proposed standards, according to the Los Alamos Daily Post (October 3, 2017). Similarly, the Santa Fe School Board unanimously voted to recommend the adoption of the NGSS, according to the Santa Fe New Mexican (October 3, 2017). The Santa Fe School Board went further by agreeing to stage a teach-in at the Public Education Department in Santa Fe on October 13, 2017. Applauding the idea, the Santa Fe New Mexican (October 3, 2017) editorialized, "Public outcry against these so-called standards has been loud and nearly unanimous in opposition. That's a good thing, because these standards are not up to snuff. State bureaucrats, especially new Public Education Department Secretary Christopher Ruszkowski, should stop by the teach-in. They could stand to learn a few things." Meanwhile, the Santa Fe New Mexican (October 3, 2017) reported that it was unable to ascertain the source of the divergences of the proposed standards from the NGSS: "it remains unclear which individuals and groups participated in the development of the teaching standards. Secretary Christopher Ruszkowski declined to name them, saying only that the process for drafting the proposal is 'how PED does business.'" The newspaper's public records request elicited only the response "There are no documents in the custody or control of the PED that appear responsive to this request." Whatever the source of the divergences, the New Mexico Science Teachers' Association expressed its opposition to the proposed standards in a letter dated October 3, 2017. The NMSTA objected to the changes regarding "the topics of evolution, earth history and climate change," arguing, "the proposed changes inject political opinions that do not represent the consensus of scientists worldwide," as well as to the omission of all of the NGSS except for the performance expectations. The organization recommended the adoption of the entire NGSS unedited instead. The Environmental Education Association of New Mexico, while not appearing yet to have issued a statement as to its position, recently conducted a series of meetings to solicit public input on the proposed standards, according to the Santa Fe New Mexican (October 4, 2017), at which "[c]omments ... echoed much of the negative feedback that has been aimed at the Public Education Department since it posted the proposed new standards on its website last month. Critics accuse the state of watering down such scientific concepts as evolution and human-caused factors affecting climate change." Previously, the National Education Association -- New Mexico, representing about half of the teachers in the state, issued a statement (posted by the Los Alamos Daily Post, September 20, 2017), calling for the adoption of "the entirety of the Next Gen standards ... not the version proposed by the P.E.D.[,] which substitutes non-scentific notions where science should be taught." The statement continued, "we shouldn't confuse political debates about responding to climate change with misleading debates about whether climate and evolutionary science is valid and should be included in standards for science education in our state." Likewise, in a September 28, 2017, letter, the LANL Foundation, which supports education in northern New Mexico, similarly objected to the modifications in the proposed standards that "contravene the principles of inquiry science, primarily in three content areas: evolution, the age of the earth, and man-made climate change" as well as to the omission of all of the NGSS except for the performance expectations and to the inclusion of additional, New-Mexico-specific, standards. Like the NMSTA, the foundation recommended the adoption of the entire NGSS unedited instead. Joining the NMSTA were two national organizations of science teachers. In a letter dated September 22, 2017, the National Science Teachers Association expressed (PDF) its opposition to the changes to the NGSS, described as intended "to advance a political view," and recommended that "only science should be taught in science classrooms." And in a letter dated October 2, 2017, the National Association of Biology Teachers objected (PDF) to "key alterations to select standards" that seemed like "an attempt to inject political influence into the curriculum." As NCSE previously reported, the Santa Fe New Mexican, the Las Cruces Sun-News, and the Albuquerque Journal have all editorially condemned the proposed standards -- the Journal memorably describing them as "fly[ing] in the face of accepted science" and "breathtaking in their offensiveness" -- as have New Mexico's senators Tom Udall (D) and Martin Heinrich (D), and two state representatives, G. Andrés Romero (D-District 10) and Bill McCamley (D-District 53), who introduced legislation that would have required New Mexico to adopt the NGSS and who blame the flaws in the proposed new standards on Governor Susana Martinez. There is still time for concerned New Mexicans to protest the proposed standards. The Public Education Department will be accepting written comments on the standards from the public through October 16, 2017 and will then hold a public hearing in Santa Fe. For the Mother Jones story, visit: www.motherjones.com/politics/2017/09/new-mexico-remove-climate-change-evolution-public-education/ For the stories about the Los Alamos and Santa Fe school boards, visit: http://www.ladailypost.com/content/school-board-talks-back-ped-science-standards http://www.santafenewmexican.com/news/local_news/santa-fe-school-board-opposes-new-state-science-education-standards/article_52900564-663b-5879-8804-22f9089e9d1e.html http://www.santafenewmexican.com/opinion/editorials/science-we-ll-show-you-science/article_417de8a3-d9b7-547c-b734-a5a2a3a8edf3.html For the Santa Fe New Mexican's article on the mysterious origins of the revisions, visit: http://www.santafenewmexican.com/news/education/state-provides-no-specifics-on-origins-of-science-proposal/article_db40bc91-6b4a-5a61-92c8-7d56b726af12.html For the NMSTA's letter (PDF), visit: http://www.nmsta.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/NMSTA-comments.pdf For the Santa Fe New Mexican's story about the EEANM's events, visit: http://www.santafenewmexican.com/news/education/state-s-proposed-science-standards-raise-red-flags-at-los/article_16b802c8-1501-5340-ba3f-c03d75559b69.html For the NEA-NM's and the LANL Foundation's statements, visit: http://ladailypost.com/content/nea-new-mexico-weighs-new-mexico-ped-proposed-science-education-standards https://www.lanlfoundation.org/news/science-standards-letter-to-ped For the NSTA's and the NABT's letters (both PDF), visit: https://ncse.com/files/NSTA%20letter%20to%20NM%209%2022%2017.pdf http://files.constantcontact.com/bd232d05601/e718b390-1001-4706-bac4-5d47ab2722d4.pdf For information on the comment period and the public hearing on the standards, visit: http://www.ped.state.nm.us/ped/PublicNotices.html And for NCSE's previous coverage of events in New Mexico, visit: https://ncse.com/news/new-mexico THE LATEST SURVEY ON CLIMATE CHANGE A new survey from the Energy Policy Institute at the University of Chicago and the Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research examines American attitudes toward climate change. Asked "Do you think climate change is happening, do you think climate change is not happening, or aren't you sure?" 72% of respondents thought that climate change is happening, while 9% thought that it is not happening, 19% were unsure, and 1% skipped or refused to answer. A press release added the detail that "85 percent of Democrats and 61 percent of Republicans" thought that climate change is happening. Respondents who thought that climate change is happening were then asked, "Do you think climate change is caused entirely by human activities, caused mostly by human activities, caused about equally by human activities and natural changes in the environment, caused mostly by natural changes in the environment, or caused entirely by natural changes in the environment?": 15% of respondents said entirely by human activities and 40% said mostly by human activities, while 32% said equally by human activities and natural changes, 11% said mostly by natural changes, and 2% said entirely by natural changes. According to the topline report of the survey, "Interviews for this survey were conducted between August 17 and 21, 2017, with adults age 18 and over representing the 50 states and the District of Columbia. Panel members were randomly drawn ... and 1,038 completed the survey -- 861 via the web and 177 via telephone. Interviews were conducted in English. ... The overall margin of sampling error is +/- 4.1 percentage points at the 95 percent confidence level, including the design effect. The margin of sampling error may be higher for subgroups." For the press release, visit: https://epic.uchicago.edu/news-events/news/new-poll-most-americans-want-government-combat-climate-change-some-willing-pay-high For the topline report (PDF), visit: http://www.apnorc.org/PDFs/EnergyClimate2017/EPIC%20Topline_FINAL.pdf And for NCSE's collection of polls and surveys on climate change, visit: https://ncse.com/library-resource/polls-climate-change ON THE ROAD AGAIN WITH DARWIN The Darwin Day Roadshow is returning! The Roadshow is a project of the BEACON Center for the Study of Evolution in Action and the Society for the Study of Evolution, in which scientists and educators share their enthusiasm for evolutionary science with students, teachers, and the general public on the occasion of Charles Darwin's birthday, February 12. "Our teams talk to students, teachers and the general public about their research in evolutionary science, describe what it takes to become an evolutionary biologist (and what some of the rewards and challenges are), and convey why evolutionary science is relevant to everyone." And the results are delightful: as Craig McClain of NESCent (which formerly operated the Roadshow) wrote at Pacific Standard (May 15, 2011), "for all of us the Darwin Day Road Show was a gratifying adventure that no one will forget. From the landscapes with their silos, combines, center pivot crop circles, high school gymnasiums, to the indelible interactions we had along the way, we absorbed it all." Applications from schools interested in hosting the Roadshow, especially those who would not be likely to have access to Darwin Day activities otherwise, are now being accepted -- now until December 20, 2017. For information about the Darwin Day Roadshow, visit: https://darwindayroadshow.wordpress.com/ And for Craig McClain's essay in Pacific Standard, visit: https://psmag.com/scientists-take-charles-darwin-on-the-road-5fd7a230614 WHAT'S NEW AT NCSE'S BLOG? Have you been visiting NCSE's blog recently? If not, then you've missed: * Eugenie C. Scott musing on the Kitzmiller v. Dover trial and the liberal arts: https://ncse.com/blog/2017/10/kitzmiller-liberal-arts-part-1-0018620 https://ncse.com/blog/2017/10/kitzmiller-liberal-arts-part-2-0018621 https://ncse.com/blog/2017/10/kitzmiller-liberal-arts-part-3-0018622 For NCSE's blog, visit: http://ncse.com/blog Thanks for reading. And don't forget to visit NCSE's website -- http://ncse.com -- where you can always find the latest news on evolution and climate education and threats to them. -- Sincerely, Glenn Branch Deputy Director National Center for Science Education, Inc. 1904 Franklin Street, Suite 600 Oakland CA 94612-2922 510-601-7203 fax 510-788-7971 branch@ncse.com http://ncse.com Check out NCSE's blog: http://ncse.com/blog Read Reports of the NCSE on-line: http://reports.ncse.com Subscribe to NCSE's free weekly e-newsletter: http://groups.google.com/group/ncse-news NCSE is on Facebook, YouTube, and Twitter: http://www.facebook.com/evolution.ncse http://www.youtube.com/NatCen4ScienceEd http://twitter.com/ncse NCSE's work is supported by its members. Join today! http://ncse.com/join