The Critic's Resource on AntiEvolution
|
Dossiers | Home | Incidents | Literature | Projects | Public BB | Topics |
Donate | NCSE | PT | TD | TOA | Public BB Archive | PvM's Blog | |
Who's onlineThere are currently 0 users and 3 guests online.
NavigationUser loginFeatured BookDonateRandom Articles
Store |
TalkOrigins ArchiveThe Talk.Origins Archive is a collection of articles and essays, most of which have appeared in talk.origins at one time or another. The primary reason for this archive's existence is to provide mainstream scientific responses to the many frequently asked questions (FAQs) that appear in the talk.origins newsgroup and the frequently rebutted assertions of those advocating intelligent design or other creationist pseudosciences.
Updated: 23 min 9 sec ago The Origin of LifeAdded October 31, 2006:A discussion of the main models on the spontaneous origin of life that aims to show how cellular complexity could have gradually emerged from simple systems - in contrast to the sudden appearance of complexity that creationists claim to have been necessary at the beginning of life. Central issues like the composition of the early atmosphere of the Earth and the origin of the homochirality of amino acids and sugars are reviewed as well.
Categories: Pro-Science News
September 2006 Post of the Month: Irreducible Complexity as an Evolutionary PredictionAdded October 19, 2006:
Categories: Pro-Science News
The Discovery Institute Quote Mines Stephen Jay GouldAdded October 9, 2006: The newest addition to the Quote Mine Project shows how Casey Luskin of Discovery Institute misrepresents what Gould and others wrote in a brief for Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals.
Categories: Pro-Science News
Awards, Honors, and Favorable Notices for The Talk.Origins ArchiveUpdated October 9, 2006: Honors won by the TalkOrigins Archive.
Categories: Pro-Science News
The Discovery Institute Quote Mines Judge JonesAdded September 28, 2006: The Discovery Institute selectively quotes Judge Jones' decision in Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District in aid of its "bait and switch" claim of scientific evidence in support of intelligent design.
Categories: Pro-Science News
August 2006 Post of the Month: The Constancy of Constants, Part 2Added September 18, 2006:
Categories: Pro-Science News
August 2006 Co-Post of the Month: An Atheist's Defense of ReligionAdded September 18, 2006:
Categories: Pro-Science News
MacroevolutionUpdated September 16, 2006: In evolutionary biology today macroevolution is used to refer to any evolutionary change at or above the level of species. It means the splitting of a species into two or the change of a species over time into another. This FAQ has been expanded, updated, illustrated, and rewritten.
Categories: Pro-Science News
Hendren v. Campbell: Decision Against a Creationist TextbookAdded August 20, 2006: A 1977 decision of an Indiana superior court ruling against a textbook produced by the Creation Research Society. In some respects this case resembles a young-earth creationist version of the 2005 Kitzmiller case. Introductory material, links, as well as the full text of the judge's memorandum opinion are provided.
Categories: Pro-Science News
Young-Earth Creationist Helium Diffusion "Dates": Fallacies Based on Bad Assumptions and Questionable DataUpdated July 25, 2006: Young-Earth creationists consider the helium diffusion studies of D. Russell Humphreys and others to be one of their greatest achievements in arguing for a 6,000 year old Earth. A geologist shows that these studies are extensively flawed and include: serious miscalculations in their data, sampling the wrong rock type, failing to eliminate possible contamination, using equations that are based on invalid assumptions and relying on questionable data. Appendices C and D have been added in response to Dr. Humphreys' most recent statements in his January 2006 "Trueorigins" essay.
Categories: Pro-Science News
June 2006 Post of the Month: How Species OriginateAdded July 25, 2006:
Categories: Pro-Science News
May 2006 Post of the Month: The Evolution of OrgansAdded July 3, 2006:
Categories: Pro-Science News
April 2006 Post of the Month: The Precambrian Song!Added May 11, 2006:
Categories: Pro-Science News
February 2006 Post of the Month: Identifying FossilsAdded March 18, 2006:
Categories: Pro-Science News
January 2006 Post of the Month: Large Numbers and Deep TimeAdded February 17, 2006:
Categories: Pro-Science News
January 2006 Co-Post of the Month: Trying to Keep Up With the JonesesAdded February 17, 2006:
Categories: Pro-Science News
Evidence for the Big BangThis article covers the evidence which leads cosmologists to believe the Big Bang happened, deals with common objections to the theory, and discusses alternative models and questions that still remain to be answered.
Categories: Pro-Science News
December 2005 Post of the Month: Unanswered QuestionsAdded January 24, 2006:
Categories: Pro-Science News
How Old is the Earth: A Response to "Scientific" CreationismAdded January 10, 2006: A classic and often-referenced 1984 paper by G. Brent Dalrymple. The paper contains short but accurate expositions of radiometric dating methods and discussions of creationist criticisms and attempts to date the Earth as young. It includes material difficult to find elsewhere, such as the discussion of mixing isochrons and the effect of neutron-capture reactions. Dr. Dalrymple is a member of the National Academy of Sciences, a winner of the National Medal of Science, a former president of the American Geophysical Union, and the author of The Age of the Earth
Categories: Pro-Science News
|
RSS SyndicationAntievolutionists Say the Darndest ThingsAntievolutionists often express outrage over alleged incivility from those who oppose their efforts to evade the establishment clause of the First Amendment. But they have no difficulty in dishing out the abuse themselves. Here is a sample from the Invidious Comparisons thread that documents egregious behavior on the part of the religious antievolution advocates. IDC advocate Jonathan Wells: These critics include embryologists, paleontologists, biochemists, molecular biologists, medical doctors, philosophers, and even lawyers. Unfortunately, the North American science-and-religion establishment has largely turned a deaf ear to these critics, preferring instead to abandon classical theology and embrace metaphysical materialism and moral relativism. But I see the situation as analogous to the last years of Soviet communism. A small, powerful elite controls all the official information outlets while the evidence against the official position swells quietly, like a wave building offshore. Someday soon, to the surprise of many people in academia and the media, the wave will break. I predict that the Darwinist establishment will come apart at the seams, just as the Soviet Empire did in 1990. LinkPro-Science Sites
|